Comparison of skeletal measurements between the Dv and NDv and between the three mandibular asymmetry groups
Roll | Yaw | Translation | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean ± SD | P value (between the sides) |
Mean ± SD | P value (between the sides) |
Mean ± SD | P value (between the sides) |
|||
Me deviation (mm) | 9.28 ± 3.06a | - | 8.93 ± 3.80a | - | 6.74 ± 2.13b | - | ||
Body length (mm) | ||||||||
Dv | 80.69 ± 5.26 | 0.002 |
80.33 ± 5.00 | < 0.001 |
80.65 ± 5.13 | 0.023 |
||
NDv | 82.06 ± 5.50 | 84.87 ± 5.44 | 82.07 ± 5.16 | |||||
ΔNDv−Dv | 1.37 ± 2.20a | - | 4.54 ± 2.79b | - | 1.42 ± 3.25a | - | ||
Ramus height (mm) | ||||||||
Dv | 65.36 ± 6.32 | < 0.001 |
68.86 ± 6.33 | < 0.001 |
68.53 ± 7.29 | < 0.001 |
||
NDv | 73.44 ± 6.35 | 71.02 ± 5.80 | 71.41 ± 6.70 | |||||
ΔNDv−Dv | 8.09 ± 3.64a | - | 2.16 ± 2.95b | - | 2.88 ± 2.43b | - | ||
Ramus inclination (°) | ||||||||
Dv | 1.88 ± 2.36a | < 0.001 |
2.47 ± 2.20a,b | 0.001 |
3.45 ± 2.46b | < 0.001 |
||
NDv | 7.34 ± 2.64a | 4.77 ± 2.99b | 7.57 ± 3.15a | |||||
ΔNDv−Dv | 5.46 ± 2.89a | - | 2.30 ± 3.41b | - | 4.11 ± 3.73a,b | - | ||
MFmid deviation (mm) | 7.12 ± 2.70 | - | 6.91 ± 3.43 | - | 5.92 ± 2.03 | - | ||
Go to MSP (mm) | ||||||||
Dv | 50.88 ± 4.64 | < 0.001 |
49.35 ± 3.06 | < 0.001 |
50.04 ± 3.80 | < 0.001 |
||
NDv | 43.89 ± 4.11a | 46.48 ± 4.23b | 43.31 ± 3.60a | |||||
ΔNDv−Dv | −7.00 ± 5.14a | - | −2.87 ± 3.67b | - | −6.73 ± 4.12a | - | ||
MHP to FHP (°) | 6.18 ± 1.24a | - | 0.87 ± 1.28b | - | 1.62 ± 0.94c | - | ||
MnMSP to MSP (°) | 1.76 ± 1.08a | - | 8.35 ± 3.41b | - | 2.06 ± 0.74a | - |
Dv, deviated side; NDv, nondeviated side; SD, standard deviation; ΔNDv−Dv, difference between the NDv and Dv; Me, menton; MFmid, midpoint of bilateral mental foramen; Go, gonion; MSP, midsagittal plane; MHP, mandibular horizontal plane; FHP, Frankfort horizontal plane; MnMSP, mandibular midsagittal plane; -, not applicable.
Values in the same row with no superscript are not statistically significant, and those with different superscript letters (a,b,c) are significantly different at P < 0.05 according to a one-way analysis of variance with Tukey’s post-hoc test.
Paired t test was performed to compare the Dv and NDv; significant difference at *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 between the Dv and NDv.