모바일 메뉴
Search
Search

KJO Korean Journal of Orthodontics

Open Access

pISSN 2234-7518
eISSN 2005-372X

퀵메뉴 버튼

Article

home All Articles View
Split Viewer

Reader’s Forum

Korean J Orthod 2016; 46(1): 1-2   https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2016.46.1.1

First Published Date January 25, 2016, Publication Date January 25, 2016

Copyright © The Korean Association of Orthodontists.

Reader's Forum

Joohyung Kim

Department of Dentistry, Hanyang University Medical Center Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Body

Seo KW, Kwon SY, Kim KA, Park KH, Kim SH, Ahn HW, Nelson G

Displacement pattern of anterior segment using combined antero-posterior lingual retractor combined with a palatal plate.

- Korean J Orthod 2015 Nov;45:289-98.

I thank the authors for this interesting article and hope to ask their further clarifications in following areas.

Q1. Compared with the C-lingual retractor group, the antero-posterior lingual retractor groups showed more intrusive effects on the anterior teeth during the retraction period. Certainly, it is desirable if a gummy smile is on the problem list. However, in more common situations of absence of the anterior vertical excess, how can one control the vertical level of the anterior teeth with the antero-posterior lingual retractor appliance?

Q2. What could be the merits of using the anteroposterior lingual retractor over the conventional lingual brackets?

Q3. To distalize or intrude the posterior teeth, what kinds of modifications do you recommend on the antero-posterior lingual retractor appliance?

Q4. Considering the action and reaction force in the law of physics, the intrusive force in the anterior region should be associated with the extrusive force in the posterior. Yet, the results showed that the vertical positions of the posterior teeth were well-maintained. How can you explain this result?

Article

Reader’s Forum

Korean J Orthod 2016; 46(1): 1-2   https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2016.46.1.1

First Published Date January 25, 2016, Publication Date January 25, 2016

Copyright © The Korean Association of Orthodontists.

Reader's Forum

Joohyung Kim

Department of Dentistry, Hanyang University Medical Center Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Body

Seo KW, Kwon SY, Kim KA, Park KH, Kim SH, Ahn HW, Nelson G

Displacement pattern of anterior segment using combined antero-posterior lingual retractor combined with a palatal plate.

- Korean J Orthod 2015 Nov;45:289-98.

I thank the authors for this interesting article and hope to ask their further clarifications in following areas.

Q1. Compared with the C-lingual retractor group, the antero-posterior lingual retractor groups showed more intrusive effects on the anterior teeth during the retraction period. Certainly, it is desirable if a gummy smile is on the problem list. However, in more common situations of absence of the anterior vertical excess, how can one control the vertical level of the anterior teeth with the antero-posterior lingual retractor appliance?

Q2. What could be the merits of using the anteroposterior lingual retractor over the conventional lingual brackets?

Q3. To distalize or intrude the posterior teeth, what kinds of modifications do you recommend on the antero-posterior lingual retractor appliance?

Q4. Considering the action and reaction force in the law of physics, the intrusive force in the anterior region should be associated with the extrusive force in the posterior. Yet, the results showed that the vertical positions of the posterior teeth were well-maintained. How can you explain this result?