모바일 메뉴
Search
Search

KJO Korean Journal of Orthodontics

Open Access

pISSN 2234-7518
eISSN 2005-372X

퀵메뉴 버튼

Article

home All Articles View
Split Viewer

Article In Press

Korean J Orthod   

Copyright © The Korean Association of Orthodontists.

The effects of maxillary incisor positions and chin prominences on the perception of lateral smiling profile attractiveness among orthodontists and laypersons

Pareeya Yongwongsoontorn 1 and Pimsiri Kanpittaya2

1 Postgraduate student, Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University
2 Lecturer, Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University

Correspondence to:Name: Pimsiri Kanpittaya
Address: Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Henri-Dunant Road, Wangmai, Pathumwan, Bangkok 10330
Phone: +66-2-2188930
Fax: +66-2-2188953
E-mail: Pimsiri.k@chula.ac.th

Accepted: October 22, 2024

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the ideal anteroposterior position of incisors in lateral smiling profiles concerning different chin prominences, and to relate these positions to nose and chin landmarks based on orthodontists' and laypersons' perceptions.
Methods: A lateral smiling profile image of a female subject was adjusted into five chin prominence series (-6, -3, 0, +3, +6 mm). For each series, the anteroposterior incisor positions were adjusted into five levels (-4, -2, 0, +2, +4 mm). Thirty-six orthodontists and 36 laypersons scored attractiveness using a visual analog scale. The maxillary incisor position (U1) relative to external nose and chin landmarks (E-line) was measured. Perception differences between orthodontists and laypersons were analyzed.
Results: In 6 and 3 mm chin retrusion, the most favored incisor positions were 2 mm retrusion and unaltered position, respectively. In the unaltered chin position, orthodontists preferred unaltered incisor, while laypersons favored 2 mm protrusion. Conversely, with 3 and 6 mm chin protrusion, the favored incisor positions were 4 mm and 2 mm protrusion, respectively, for both groups. The distance U1-E-line of the most attractive images ranged from 8.5-11.5 mm. From the regression model, the distance of 8.95 mm was recommended.
Conclusion: The preferred incisor position depended on the chin prominence. The favored incisor position tended to change in the same direction as the chin. The U1 to E-line can be the clinically useful tool for determining the proper incisor positions. The esthetic perception was similar between orthodontists and laypersons.

Keywords: Esthetics, Perception, Soft tissue

Article

ahead

Korean J Orthod   

First Published Date October 23, 2024

Copyright © The Korean Association of Orthodontists.

The effects of maxillary incisor positions and chin prominences on the perception of lateral smiling profile attractiveness among orthodontists and laypersons

Pareeya Yongwongsoontorn 1 and Pimsiri Kanpittaya2

1 Postgraduate student, Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University
2 Lecturer, Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University

Correspondence to:Name: Pimsiri Kanpittaya
Address: Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Henri-Dunant Road, Wangmai, Pathumwan, Bangkok 10330
Phone: +66-2-2188930
Fax: +66-2-2188953
E-mail: Pimsiri.k@chula.ac.th

Accepted: October 22, 2024

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the ideal anteroposterior position of incisors in lateral smiling profiles concerning different chin prominences, and to relate these positions to nose and chin landmarks based on orthodontists' and laypersons' perceptions.
Methods: A lateral smiling profile image of a female subject was adjusted into five chin prominence series (-6, -3, 0, +3, +6 mm). For each series, the anteroposterior incisor positions were adjusted into five levels (-4, -2, 0, +2, +4 mm). Thirty-six orthodontists and 36 laypersons scored attractiveness using a visual analog scale. The maxillary incisor position (U1) relative to external nose and chin landmarks (E-line) was measured. Perception differences between orthodontists and laypersons were analyzed.
Results: In 6 and 3 mm chin retrusion, the most favored incisor positions were 2 mm retrusion and unaltered position, respectively. In the unaltered chin position, orthodontists preferred unaltered incisor, while laypersons favored 2 mm protrusion. Conversely, with 3 and 6 mm chin protrusion, the favored incisor positions were 4 mm and 2 mm protrusion, respectively, for both groups. The distance U1-E-line of the most attractive images ranged from 8.5-11.5 mm. From the regression model, the distance of 8.95 mm was recommended.
Conclusion: The preferred incisor position depended on the chin prominence. The favored incisor position tended to change in the same direction as the chin. The U1 to E-line can be the clinically useful tool for determining the proper incisor positions. The esthetic perception was similar between orthodontists and laypersons.

Keywords: Esthetics, Perception, Soft tissue