Korean J Orthod
Copyright © The Korean Association of Orthodontists.
1. Nurver Karslı (Assistant Professor; First author and corresponding author)
Institution Name: Karadeniz Technical University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics
Address: Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Hastane Caddesi No:13/A 61080 Ortahisar / Trabzon / Türkiye
E mail: dtnurverkarsli@hotmail.com
Orcid No: 0000-0003-3585-9440
2. Irmak Ocak (Assistant Professor)
Institution Name: Hacettepe University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics
Address: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Sıhhiye, 06230 Ankara / Türkiye.
E mail: irmakpartal@hotmail.com
Orcid No: 0000-0002-4547-3595
3. Sevil Gökcek ( Research Assistant)
Institution Name: Karadeniz Technical University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics
Address: Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Hastane Caddesi No:13/A 61080 Ortahisar / Trabzon / Türkiye
E mail: sevilgokcek@gmail.com
Orcid No: 0009-0009-2040-0208
4. Ömür Polat Özsoy (Professor)
Institution Name: Private Practice, Orthodontics Specialist Prof. Dr. Ömür Polat Özsoy
Address: Barbaros, İran Cd. No:15 D No:7, 06680 Çankaya/Ankara / Türkiye
E mail: omurpolatozsoy@gmail.com
Orcid No: 0000-0002-8555-1367
Correspondence to:Nurver KARSLI
Karadeniz Technical University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Trabzon / Türkiye.
Assistant Professor
E mail: dtnurverkarsli@hotmail.com
Tel: 00 90 5512078677
Office: 0462 377 47 00
Introduction: The effect of different attachment positions on torque control during the labialization of maxillary lateral incisor with clear aligners was evaluated using the finite element analysis.
Materials and Methods: The anatomical data acquired through cone-beam computed tomography, in conjunction with the designs of 0.625-mm-thick aligners and horizontal attachments, were integrated into the software. Five distinct simulations were generated: (1) an attachment-free group, (2) a labial attachment placed gingivally, (3) a labial attachment placed mid-crown, (4) a labial attachment placed incisally, (5) an attachment placed palatally, and (6) attachments placed both labially and palatally. The evaluation was performed with a default 0.25 mm aligner activation.
Results: The crown of the lateral incisor demonstrated labial movement, while the root exhibited a palatal movement in all models. Group 6 displayed the least crown and root displacement in both axes. Conversely, the attachment-free group showed the most extensive crown movement. The aligner experienced maximum deformation at the incisal edge, progressively decreasing towards the gingival region. The Group 6 demonstrated the least amount of aligner deformation. Von Mises stresses in the periodontal ligament (PDL) were more pronounced at the gingival level, with higher values on the palatal side compared to the labial area.
Conclusions: The utilization of attachments, especially a combination of labial and palatal attachments, facilitates a more precise labialization process, contributing to reduced tipping. Increasing the crown movement of the lateral incisor increases the stress within the PDL, with the most intense stress observed in the palatal region at the gingival level.
Keywords: Clear aligners, Lateral incisor, Torque, Finite element analysis
Korean J Orthod
First Published Date November 11, 2024
Copyright © The Korean Association of Orthodontists.
1. Nurver Karslı (Assistant Professor; First author and corresponding author)
Institution Name: Karadeniz Technical University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics
Address: Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Hastane Caddesi No:13/A 61080 Ortahisar / Trabzon / Türkiye
E mail: dtnurverkarsli@hotmail.com
Orcid No: 0000-0003-3585-9440
2. Irmak Ocak (Assistant Professor)
Institution Name: Hacettepe University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics
Address: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Sıhhiye, 06230 Ankara / Türkiye.
E mail: irmakpartal@hotmail.com
Orcid No: 0000-0002-4547-3595
3. Sevil Gökcek ( Research Assistant)
Institution Name: Karadeniz Technical University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics
Address: Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Hastane Caddesi No:13/A 61080 Ortahisar / Trabzon / Türkiye
E mail: sevilgokcek@gmail.com
Orcid No: 0009-0009-2040-0208
4. Ömür Polat Özsoy (Professor)
Institution Name: Private Practice, Orthodontics Specialist Prof. Dr. Ömür Polat Özsoy
Address: Barbaros, İran Cd. No:15 D No:7, 06680 Çankaya/Ankara / Türkiye
E mail: omurpolatozsoy@gmail.com
Orcid No: 0000-0002-8555-1367
Correspondence to:Nurver KARSLI
Karadeniz Technical University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Trabzon / Türkiye.
Assistant Professor
E mail: dtnurverkarsli@hotmail.com
Tel: 00 90 5512078677
Office: 0462 377 47 00
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Introduction: The effect of different attachment positions on torque control during the labialization of maxillary lateral incisor with clear aligners was evaluated using the finite element analysis.
Materials and Methods: The anatomical data acquired through cone-beam computed tomography, in conjunction with the designs of 0.625-mm-thick aligners and horizontal attachments, were integrated into the software. Five distinct simulations were generated: (1) an attachment-free group, (2) a labial attachment placed gingivally, (3) a labial attachment placed mid-crown, (4) a labial attachment placed incisally, (5) an attachment placed palatally, and (6) attachments placed both labially and palatally. The evaluation was performed with a default 0.25 mm aligner activation.
Results: The crown of the lateral incisor demonstrated labial movement, while the root exhibited a palatal movement in all models. Group 6 displayed the least crown and root displacement in both axes. Conversely, the attachment-free group showed the most extensive crown movement. The aligner experienced maximum deformation at the incisal edge, progressively decreasing towards the gingival region. The Group 6 demonstrated the least amount of aligner deformation. Von Mises stresses in the periodontal ligament (PDL) were more pronounced at the gingival level, with higher values on the palatal side compared to the labial area.
Conclusions: The utilization of attachments, especially a combination of labial and palatal attachments, facilitates a more precise labialization process, contributing to reduced tipping. Increasing the crown movement of the lateral incisor increases the stress within the PDL, with the most intense stress observed in the palatal region at the gingival level.
Keywords: Clear aligners, Lateral incisor, Torque, Finite element analysis